CD123 As a Therapeutic Target in Accelerated and Blast Phase Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs)

Abstract

Background: CD123 expression in MPNs has been reported in case series and CD123 has been a therapeutic target in one phase I study of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or myelofibrosis in chronic phase. CD123 has also been described as a marker of leukemic stem cells and incorporated in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell products for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in clinical trials. Herein, we describe the clinical phenotype of patients with accelerated (AP) or blast phase (BP) MPNs paired with CD123 co-expression on CD45(dim) myeloid blasts. Methods: This is a retrospective, single-institution study of patients with AP and BP MPNs. Subjects were identified by search for MPN diagnoses in the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Leukemia Tissue Bank (OSUCCC-LTB). Relevant clinical data was collected by retrospective chart review with approval of Institutional Review Board. CD123 expression was measured by immunophenotyping of cryopreserved peripheral blood (PB) or marrow (BM) samples. Blasts were identified by CD45(dim) gating of lymphocytes. Lymphocytes were also gated on CD7, CD13, CD33, CD34, and CD117. CD123 expression was stratified by quartile and correlation with disease phase, symptoms, splenomegaly, transfusion-dependence, and molecular mutations measured by Chi-square test. Results: Forty-one PB or BM samples from 24 subjects were identified from the OSUCCC-LTB. Nine subjects had paired PB and BM specimens and 6 subjects had samples obtained at multiple timepoints in the course of their disease. Median age at time of sample collection was 65.8 years (range 35.2-79.7) and median time from initial diagnosis to sampling was 13.1 months (range 0-96.5). Constitutional symptoms were present at the time of collection in 24 specimens (58.5%) and splenomegaly present in 20 specimens (51.3%). At sample collection, 19.5% had never received treatment, 19.5% had been previously treated, and 61% were currently on treatment. Most patients on treatment (n=16, 64%) were receiving JAK inhibitor at sample collection. Nineteen samples were obtained in chronic phase (46.3%), nine in AP (22.0%), and thirteen in BP (31.7%). Median WBC count was 4.37K/uL (range 0.3-174.6), median peripheral blasts were 3.2% (range 0-76%), median hemoglobin was 8.8 g/dL (range 5.6-13.2), and median platelets were 42K/uL (range 5-564). Sixteen samples (39.0%) were from transfusion-dependent patients, of which, 68.8% were both red blood cell (RBC) and platelet transfusion-dependent, 25.0% were RBC transfusion-dependent only, and 6.2% were platelet transfusion-dependent only. Median lactate dehydrogenase at time of sampling was 300 U/L (range 116-2,142). Median bone marrow blasts at time of sampling were 3% (range 0-82%). Molecular sequencing and karyotype +/- 30 days of sample collection were available for 18 (43.9%) and 27 (65.9%) of specimens, respectively. The most common mutations identified were JAK2 (50%), ASXL1 (27.8%), SRSF2 (22.2%), CALR (16.7%), and TP53 (16.7%). Normal karyotype was reported in 37% of the samples (one was consistent with donor chimerism post-allogeneic SCT), 33.3% had complex karyotype, 11.1% had del 5q or 7q/-7, and 18.5% had del 13q or 20q. CD123 expression on the CD45(dim) gated blasts ranged from 0.3-95.6% with a median value of 11.02%. CD123 expression is presented in figure 1 box plot. Figure 2a shows correlation between CD123 expression and AP/BP compared to chronic phase disease (p < 0.01). Figure 2b shows CD123 expression correlation with ASXL1 compared to unmutated ASXL1 (p =0.023). There were no statistically significant associations between CD123 expression and any other tested variables. Conclusions: These single-institution data suggest that high CD123 expression on blasts is associated with leukemic transformation and high-risk disease. This is demonstrated by correlation of higher expression in AP and BP MPN as well as correlation with ASXL1 mutation. CD123 expression in MPNs has been previously reported and explored as a therapeutic target in a single phase I trial, though these data suggest that specifically targeting high risk disease, defined by blasts >10% or the presence of ASXL1 mutation, may be more effective with greater target availability. This is an especially important subpopulation of patients with MPNs in need of more effective and less toxic therapy than current standards of care that typically include cytotoxic chemotherapy.