Abstract

The high temperature tensile ductility of alumina doped with MgO or ZrO{sub 2} is limited around 70--110% for initial grain sizes of about 1 {micro}m. Such limitation may be correlated with strain hardening due to insufficiently suppressed grain growth in MgO-doped alumina or the level of flow stress heightened owing to second phase pinning and/or the intergranular segregation of Zr{sup 4+} ions in ZrO{sub 2}-doped one. This is because higher flow stresses can be assumed to accelerate damage process and thereby to limit tensile ductility. In comparison between these materials, however, such an approach based simply on flow rather similar tensile ductilities as above, irrespective of noticeable differences both in strain hardening behavior and in the level of flow stress between them. Although information on intergranular cavitation damage will give an additional basis for explanation, there has been little quantitative work on cavitation in there martials. The present study, therefore, examined the evolution of cavitation damage in a 0.2-wt%-MgO-doped alumina and a 10-vol%-ZrO{sub 2}-doped alumina with the same initial grain size of 1.0 {micro}m. An emphasis was placed on characterizing the difference in cavitation behavior between the materials.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.