Abstract
The flow stress behavior and recrystallization kinetics in the hot rolling temperature range have been investigated in five Fe‐Mn‐Al (Mn: 25 wt%, Al: 0‐8 wt%) TWIP steels by compression testing on a Gleeble simulator. Results were compared with corresponding properties of carbon and austenitic stainless steels. Microstructures were examined by electron microscopy. The results show that the flow stress level of the TWIP steels is considerably higher than that of low-carbon steels and depended on the Al concentration close to 6 wt%, while the structure is austenitic at hot rolling temperatures. At higher Al contents, the flow stress level becomes significantly lowered due to the presence of ferrite. The static recrystallization kinetics is slower compared to that of carbon steels, but it is faster than typical of Nb-microalloyed or austenitic stainless steels. High Mn content is a reason for the high flow stress as well as for slow softening. Al has a minor role only, but in the case of austenitic‐ferritic structure, softening of the ferrite phase occurs very rapidly that also contributes to overall faster softening. The grain size is effectively refined by the dynamic and static recrystallization processes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
