Catheter burden following urogynecologic surgery

Abstract

Data on the experience that women who undergo urogynecologic surgery have with postoperative catheterization are severely limited. As the importance of our patients' perioperative experience becomes more valued, assessment of the burden of postoperative catheterization, which has not yet been performed, is increasingly needed. The aim of this study was to compare catheter burden in women who self-selected use of an indwelling Foley catheter vs clean intermittent self-catheterization for voiding dysfunction after reconstructive pelvic surgery. This is a nested study within a nonblinded randomized controlled trial of 2 different voiding trial protocols that was conducted from March to October 2017. Women who underwent pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence surgery who were English speaking and ≥18 years old with a preoperative postvoid residual <100 mL were included. Participants who did not pass their voiding trial were discharged with an indwelling Foley catheter or self-catheterization per participant preference. Our primary outcome was catheter burden at 1 week after surgery assessed by the Short-Term Catheter Burden Questionnaire, which is a validated 6-item survey comprised of 2 subscales: difficulty of use and embarrassment. Scores range from 3-15 withhigher scores indicating greater difficulty and/or embarrassment, and the sum of the 2 subscale scores measures total catheter burden with a higher score indicating greater burden. Secondary outcomes included the rate of urinary tract infection, the number of postoperative clinic visits, and the number of postoperative phone calls. Of 150 participants, 77 women (51%) did not pass their voiding trial; of those, 47 women (61%) were discharged home with an indwelling catheter and 30 women (39%) with self-catheterization. Baseline demographics were similar, except that women who chose an indwelling Foley catheter were older (62±11 vs 55±11 years; P<.01). There were no significant differences between indwelling Foley catheter and self-catheterization in total catheter burden score (18±5 vs 18±6; P=.77), difficulty of use subscale score (8±3 vs 9±3; P=.20), or embarrassment subscale score (10±4 vs 9±4; P=.12). For secondary outcomes, there were no significant differences in rate of urinary tract infection (23% indwelling vs 30% self-catheterization; P=.60). Consistent with study protocol, women who were discharged with an indwelling Foley catheter did have more postoperative clinic visits (2±1 vs 1±1 visits; P<.01), and those women who were discharged with self-catheterization had more postoperative phone calls (2±3 vs 5±3 phone calls; P<.01). Otherwise there was no significant difference in nonvoiding-related clinic visits (1±1 visits for indwelling and self-catheterization; P=.15) or postoperative phone calls (1±2 indwelling vs 2±3 self-catheterization calls; P=.31). In women who used either an indwelling Foley catheter or clean intermittent self-catheterization for management of postoperative voiding dysfunction after pelvic reconstructive surgery, there were no differences in difficulty of use, embarrassment, or overall catheter burden. There were also no differences in nonvoiding-related postoperative phone calls or clinic visits, with similar rates of urinary tract infection between the 2 groups.