Casual C peptide index: Predicting the subsequent need for insulin therapy in outpatients with type 2 diabetes under primary care.

Abstract

BackgroundEvaluation of residual beta cell function is indispensable in patients with type 2 diabetes as it informs not only diagnoses but also appropriate treatment modalities. However, there is a lack of convenient biomarkers for residual beta cell function. Therefore, we evaluated endogenous insulin level as a biomarker in outpatients who were being treated with insulin therapy and in patients who were introduced to insulin therapy after 4 years.MethodsData of 174 outpatients with type 2 diabetes (50% male) whose glycemia was moderately controlled (glycated A1c 7.3% [5.2%–14.8%]) were reviewed. Twenty patients whose estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower than 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 were excluded from the evaluation of endogenous insulin level with both casual C‐peptide index (C‐CPI) and urinary C‐peptide/creatinine ratio (determined at any time, generally 1–2 h after breakfast). Patients were stratified based on the provision of insulin therapy.ResultsC‐CPI and UCPCR were significantly lower in the insulin‐treated patients than in the insulin‐untreated patients (0.9 vs. 2.2, p < 0.0001; 24.7 vs. 75.5, p = 0.0003, respectively). Moreover, C‐CPI were significantly lower in the insulin‐requiring patients for 4 years than in the insulin‐unrequiring patients (1.0 vs. 1.7, p = 0.0184). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that both indicators of insulin secretion influenced the requirement for insulin therapy, but C‐CPI could serve as the most convenient and useful biomarker for not only current insulin therapy requirements (p = 0.0002) but also the subsequent requirement for insulin therapy (p = 0.0008).ConclusionsC‐CPI could be determined easily, and it was found to be a more practical marker for outpatients; therefore, our findings would have critical implications for primary care.