Abstract
In this work, the directionality effects during the MW 7.8 earthquake, which occurred in Muisne (Ecuador) on 16 April 2016, were analyzed under two perspectives. The first one deals with the influence of these effects on seismic intensity measures (IMs), while the second refers to the assessment of the expected damage of a specific building located in Manta city, Ecuador, as a function of its azimuthal orientation. The records of strong motion in 21 accelerometric stations were used to analyze directionality in seismic actions. At the closest station to the epicenter (RRup = 20 km), the peak ground acceleration was 1380 cm/s2 (EW component of the APED station). A detailed study of the response spectra ratifies the importance of directionality and confirms the need to consider these effects in seismic hazard studies. Differences between IMs values that consider the directionality and those obtained from the as-recorded accelerograms are significant and they agree with studies carried out in other regions. Concerning the variation of the expected damage with respect to the building orientation, a reinforced concrete building, which was seriously affected by the earthquake, was taken as a case study. For this analysis, the accelerograms recorded at a nearby station and detailed structural documentation were used. The ETABS software was used for the structural analysis. Modal and pushover analyses were performed, obtaining capacity curves and capacity spectra in the two main axes of the building. Two advanced methods for damage assessment were used to obtain fragility and mean damage state curves. The performance points were obtained through the linear equivalent approximation. This allows estimation and analysis of the expected mean damage state and the probability of complete damage as functions of the building orientation. Results show that the actual probability of complete damage is close to 60%. This fact is mainly due to the greater severity of the seismic action in one of the two main axes of the building. The results are in accordance with the damage produced by the earthquake in the building and confirm the need to consider the directionality effects in damage and seismic risk assessments.
Highlights
PGAX, PGAY, PGALarger, and PGAmax were computed for the 21 ground-motion records available
PGAEW presents larger values when compared to PGANS
The impact of the earthquakeon onthe the building building was analyzed assuming thatthat the seismic action did not significantly differ from the one recorded near the site
Summary
The epicenter was located near the town of Muisne, 170 km northwest from Quito. The epicenter was in a remote rural area, several towns in the coastal provinces were affected due to their high intensity. The earthquake occurred at a 20-km depth as a result of the relative displacement between the Nazca plate and the South American plate, through a subduction process [1]. This process has generated catastrophic events in South America throughout the contact zone between these two plates, repeatedly, affecting Chile, Peru, and Ecuador [2]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have