Abstract
Background and purpose Despite advances in endovascular therapies, some patients experience vertebral artery stenosis or subclavian artery occlusion and may not benefit from less-invasive angioplasty/stenting. This study described 4 cases in which carotid-vertebral transposition (CVT) or carotid-subclavian transposition (CST) was adapted when endovascular treatment was unfeasible or unsuccessful. Presentation Case 1: A 65-year-old woman presented with severe stenosis of the right vertebral artery ostium, dysplastic left vertebral artery, and aneurysmal dilatation of proximal right subclavian artery and brachiocephalic trunk. Case 2: A 23-year-woman had severe stenosis at the first portion of left vertebral artery caused by Takayasu's arteritis. Because endovascular intervention was unfeasible, CVTs were performed in cases 1 and 2. Case 3: A 73-year-old man presented with total occlusion of the proximal right subclavian artery and severe stenosis of the right internal carotid artery. Case 4: A 58-year-old man experienced complete occlusion of the left subclavian artery and severe stenosis of the left common carotid artery. Duplex ultrasonography showed reverse flow in the vertebral artery in keeping with vertebral steal syndrome. Endovascular treatment was unsuccessful because the wire did not cross the occlusion of the subclavian artery. CSTs were performed with concurrent ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy in cases 3 and 4. Conclusion The present case series demonstrated that CST and CVT were effective treatment modalities for subclavian or vertebral artery lesions. Although endovascular stenting and angioplasty have been advocated as first-line management, CST and CVT should be considered as the remedy when endovascular intervention is unsuccessful or unfeasible.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call