Abstract
Australian women now work in the paid labourforce in greater numbers. Accordingly, local community services to help care for workers' dependents are becoming increasingly important, as fewer households include full-time carers. But there are considerable differences in the way local states approach the task of caring for workers' dependents, and these have varied implications for particular class and gender groups. Focusing on child-care provision, but with some reference also to services for aged dependents, this paper describes the community-service practice of two Melbourne municipalities and the class and gender biases they incorporate. It then proposes an initial explanation of the differences found, drawing on interactions between bureaucrats, elected councillors and community activists in those places.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.