Cardiovascular Molecular Imaging

Abstract

HomeArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular BiologyVol. 29, No. 7Cardiovascular Molecular Imaging Free AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessReview ArticlePDF/EPUBCardiovascular Molecular Imaging Zahi A. Fayad Zahi A. FayadZahi A. Fayad From the Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York. Search for more papers by this author Originally published1 Jul 2009https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.191809Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2009;29:981–982Molecular imaging is defined today as the visualization, characterization, and measurement of biological processes at the molecular and cellular levels in humans and other living systems, and molecular imaging agents are probes used to visualize, characterize, and measure biological processes in living system.Most of us in the cardiovascular imaging field look at the routine use of molecular imaging in cancer research, clinical trials, and medical practice.1 However, recent developments in cardiovascular biology and biochemistry, coupled with remarkable advances in imaging technologies, are beginning now to make molecular imaging a vital preclinical and clinical tool in the field of atherosclerosis, thrombosis, vascular biology, and cardiovascular medicine.2In this issue of the ATVB, we present a series of concise review articles on in vivo molecular cardiovascular multimodality imaging. These articles present overview of some the opportunities in the areas of atherosclerosis, thrombosis, inflammation, angiogenesis, apoptosis, diabetes, and cellular therapy. The series also covers the challenges that cardiovascular molecular imaging faces to fulfill its promise in the clinical practice.The series begins with “Molecular Imaging in Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Inflammation” by Choudhury and Fisher.3 They provide a comparative analysis of the different imaging modalities that have been used. They emphasize how an understanding of the biology of atherosclerosis and its complications can inform optimal design of the different elements of the contrast agents. They address the potential and limitations of current contrast approaches in respect of translation to clinically usable agents and speculate on future applications. Cormode et al4 cover, in “Nanotechnology in Medical Imaging: Probe Design and Applications,” the use of nanoparticles and the important elements and factors involved in the design of targeted molecular imaging probes. They focus on lipid-based nanoparticles because of the ease in synthesis and manipulation to include different imaging labels, targeting vectors, and therapeutic agents. They give several examples of the most advanced applications of these nanoparticles different disease processes.Macrophages have been recognized as key elements in atherothrombotic high-risk/vulnerable plaques. Tjun Y Tang and coworkers from the Cambridge group,5 in “Iron Oxide Particles for Atheroma Imaging,” discuss the use of Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) contrast agents and noninvasive MRI for the assessment of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation. This article reviews the basic science behind the use of USPIO contrast agents in macrophage MR imaging both at the experimental and clinical research level. The theme of inflammation continues with “Inflammation Imaging in Atherosclerosis” by Rudd et al from the Mount Sinai group.6 This review demonstrates the clinical translation of highly sensitive nuclear techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and fluorodeoxyglucose (F18-FDG) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the evaluation of in atherosclerosis in humans. The review also shows that even techniques such as computed tomography (CT), which in the past has not been given much consideration for molecular imaging because of its poor sensitivity, has shown potential for inflammation imaging using iodine-based nanoparticles in atherosclerotic rabbits. Jaffer and coworkers7 cover in “Optical and Multimodality Molecular Imaging: Insights Into Atherosclerosis” the growing role of in vivo optical molecular imaging in atherosclerosis and highlights its ability to visualize atheroma inflammation, calcification, and angiogenesis. In addition, like in the Cormode et al review,4 they discuss advances in multimodality probes, both in the context of multimodal imaging as well as multifunctional, or “theranostic,” nanoparticles.Cellular transplantation therapy has been gaining interest for the treatment of cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus. Kraitchman and Bulte, in “In Vivo Imaging of Stem Cells and Beta Cells Using Direct Cell Labeling and Reporter Gene Methods,”8 show that molecular imaging can provide a means to determine the efficacy of these therapies. This review shows that direct labeling of stem, progenitor, and beta cells continues to provide important insights into the underlying mechanisms of action and in determining the optimal dosing and cell type. Finally, in “Imaging of Cell Death in Atherosclerosis”9 by Laufer et al, the biology of cell death and the role of molecular imaging of apoptosis are discussed in detail. They show the possible development and translation of apoptosis markers, such as Annexin A5, into clinical research imaging probes using SPECT imaging in carotid disease patients.ATVB is committed to the field of cardiovascular molecular imaging as highlighted by this series, by recent review articles such as the one on cellular imaging technologies for the dynamic study of labeled immune cells in intact tissue environments,10 and by upcoming reviews that will cover, for example, ultrasound molecular imaging, myocardial molecular imaging, and drug delivery. We hope that this series stimulates the submissions of original contributions and reviews to ATVB.In summary, this series of review articles by established leaders in the field will serve as both a valuable resource in the rapidly evolving fields of vascular biology and cardiovascular molecular imaging and as guideposts for future work.Sources of FundingThis work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants NHLBI R01 HL71021, NHLBI R01 HL 78667, and NIBIB R01 EB 009638.DisclosuresNone.FootnotesCorrespondence to Zahi A. Fayad, PhD, FAHA, FACC, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1234, New York, NY 10029. E-mail [email protected]References1 Weissleder R, Pittet MJ. Imaging in the era of molecular oncology. Nature. 2008; 452: 580–589.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Sanz J, Fayad ZA. Imaging of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2008; 451: 953–957.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Choudhury RP, Fisher EA. Molecular imaging in atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 983–991.LinkGoogle Scholar4 Cormode DP, Skajaa T, Fayad ZA, Mulder WJM. Nanotechnology in medical imaging: probe design and applications. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 992–1000.LinkGoogle Scholar5 Tang TY, Muller KH, Graves MJ, Li ZY, Walsh SR, Young V, Sadat U, Howarth SPS, Gillard JH. Iron oxide particles for atheroma imaging. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 1001–1008.LinkGoogle Scholar6 Rudd JHF, Hyafil F, Fayad ZA. Inflammation imaging in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 1009–1016.LinkGoogle Scholar7 Jaffer FA, Libby P, Weissleder R. Optical and multimodality molecular imaging: insights into atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 1017–1024.LinkGoogle Scholar8 Kraitchman DL, Bulte JWM. In vivo imaging of stem cells and beta cells using direct cell labeling and reporter gene methods. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 1025–1030.LinkGoogle Scholar9 Laufer EM, Winkens MHM, Narula J, Hofstra L. Imaging of cell death in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: 1031–1038.LinkGoogle Scholar10 Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Pittet MJ. Heterogeneous in vivo behavior of monocyte subsets in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009; 29: •••–•••.Google Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Posokhov Y, Kyrychenko A and Korniyenko Y (2018) Derivatives of 2,5-Diaryl-1,3-Oxazole and 2,5-Diaryl-1,3,4-Oxadiazole as Environment-Sensitive Fluorescent Probes for Studies of Biological Membranes Reviews in Fluorescence 2017, 10.1007/978-3-030-01569-5_9, (199-230), . Ahmed M, Cerroni B, Razuvaev A, Härmark J, Paradossi G, Caidahl K and Gustafsson B (2017) Cellular Uptake of Plain and SPION-Modified Microbubbles for Potential Use in Molecular Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 10.1007/s12195-017-0504-9, 10:6, (537-548), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017. Gustafsson B, Hedin U and Caidahl K (2014) Glycolaldehyde and maleyl conjugated human serum albumin as potential macrophage‐targeting carriers for molecular imaging purposes, Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging, 10.1002/cmmi.1598, 10:1, (37-42), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015. Libby P, Jaffer F and Weissleder R (2012) Molecular Imaging in Cardiovascular Disease Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 10.1016/B978-1-4377-0398-6.00023-8, (448-458), . Gallino A, Stuber M, Crea F, Falk E, Corti R, Lekakis J, Schwitter J, Camici P, Gaemperli O, Di Valentino M, Prior J, Garcia-Garcia H, Vlachopoulos C, Cosentino F, Windecker S, Pedrazzini G, Conti R, Mach F, De Caterina R and Libby P (2012) “In vivo” imaging of atherosclerosis, Atherosclerosis, 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.04.007, 224:1, (25-36), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2012. Charo I and Taub R (2011) Anti-inflammatory therapeutics for the treatment of atherosclerosis, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 10.1038/nrd3444, 10:5, (365-376), Online publication date: 1-May-2011. Lee D, Nahrendorf M, Schellingerhout D and Kim D (2010) Will Molecular Optical Imaging Have Clinically Important Roles in Stroke Management, and How?, Journal of Clinical Neurology, 10.3988/jcn.2010.6.1.10, 6:1, (10), . Matter C, Stuber M and Nahrendorf M (2009) Imaging of the unstable plaque: how far have we got?, European Heart Journal, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp419, 30:21, (2566-2574), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2009., Online publication date: 1-Nov-2009. Posokhov Y (2016) Fluorescent probes sensitive to changes in the cholesterol-to-phospholipids molar ratio in human platelet membranes during atherosclerosis, Methods and Applications in Fluorescence, 10.1088/2050-6120/4/3/034013, 4:3, (034013) July 2009Vol 29, Issue 7 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.191809PMID: 19535793 Originally publishedJuly 1, 2009 PDF download Advertisement