Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of CO2 removal during conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) with and without expiratory phase intratracheal pulmonary ventilation (expiratory ITPV or Exp-ITPV); and to compare CO2 clearance during Exp-ITPV, in pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and in volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) modes. Seven anesthetized rabbits were tracheotomized and intubated using a 4 mm endotracheal tube. Venous and arterial lines were established. The rabbits were paralyzed, mechanically ventilated, and ventilation parameters were adjusted to achieve baseline arterial hypercapnia. Animals were then ventilated during 30-minute trials of CMV and Exp-ITPV, in both PCV and VCV modes. A custom-built, microprocessor-controlled solenoid valve was used to limit ITPV gas flow to the expiratory phase. Proximal and carinal airway pressures and hemodynamic variables were continuously recorded, and arterial blood gases were analyzed at the end of each trial. Exp-ITPV, as compared with CMV, reduced arterial PCO2 by 12% and 21% in PCV and VCV modes, respectively (p < 0.02 and p < 0.001; one-sided paired t test), without significant changes in other cardiorespiratory variables. In conclusion, Exp-ITPV is more effective than CMV in clearing CO2 through a small endotracheal tube. Exp-ITPV is also more effective in VCV mode than PCV mode.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.