Carbon assimilation mode in mixotrophs and the fatty acid composition of their rotifer consumers

Abstract

Summary1. We examined an important ecophysiological link between the mixotrophic flagellate Chlamydomonas acidophila and its consumers, the rotifers Elosa worallii, Cephalodella sp. and Brachionus sericus, by comparing their fatty acid profiles.2. The mixotrophic flagellate was grown under either exclusively autotrophic conditions in the light, under exclusively heterotrophic conditions in the dark with an organic carbon source (glucose), or in the light plus the organic carbon sources (=mixotrophic).3. Under heterotrophic growth conditions, C. acidophila strongly reduced its content of the n‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) alpha‐linolenic acid (ALA, C18:3n‐3) compared with auto‐ and mixotrophic growth conditions. Although PUFAs with more than 18 carbon atoms were not detected in C. acidophila, significant amounts of eicosatetraenoic (ETA, 20:4n‐3) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n‐3) were found in three rotifer consumers.4. Species‐specific differences in the fatty acid profiles with respect to ETA, EPA and the precursor ALA were found in the rotifers: Brachionus and Cephalodella fed on the heterotrophic diets synthesised less EPA. In Elosa, smaller amounts of ALA were detected but were converted efficiently to a constant content of EPA and to an exceptionally high content of ETA.5. Since in nature the mode of carbon assimilation among mixotrophic organisms differs, and their fatty acid composition varies depending on their mode of carbon assimilation, the availability of ALA might be critical for their consumers. An insufficient dietary supply of this precursor for the synthesis of ETA and EPA can prevent consumers from regulating their content of ETA and EPA. Therefore, observed differences in values of the latter might underly species‐specific differences in the competitive capability of consumers.