Abstract

Whilst North to South knowledge transfer patterns have been extensively problematised by Southern and decolonial perspectives, there is very little reflection on the practice of research capacity development (RCD), still strongly focused on technoscientific solutionism, yet largely uncritical of its underlying normative directions and power asymmetries. Without making transparent these normative and epistemological dimensions, RCD practices will continue to perpetuate approaches that are likely to be narrow, technocratic and unreflexive of colonial legacies, thus failing to achieve the aims of RCD, namely, the equitable and development-oriented production of knowledge in low- and middle-income societies. Informed by the authors' direct experience of RCD approaches and combining insights from decolonial works and other perspectives from the margins with Science and Technology Studies, the paper undertakes a normative and epistemological deconstruction of RCD mainstream practice. Highlighting asymmetries of power and material resources in knowledge production, the paper's decolonial lens seeks to aid the planning, implementation and evaluation of RCD interventions. Principles of cognitive justice and epistemic pluralism, accessibility enabled by systems thinking and sustainability grounded on localisation are suggested as the building blocks for more reflexive and equitable policies that promote research capacity for the purpose of creating social value and not solely for the sake of perpetuating technoscience.

Highlights

  • Research capacity development (RCD), often called research capacity building or research capacity strengthening, is defined as ‘an ongoing process of empowering individuals, institutions, organizations and nations to: define and prioritize problems systematically; develop and scientifically evaluate appropriate solutions; and share and apply the knowledge generated’ (Lansang & Dennis, 2004: 764–5)

  • In the context of international development, RCD refers to interventions, typically delivered by high-income countries (HICs), that seek to enhance the ability of individuals and institutions in lowand middle-income countries (LMICs) to produce and use scientific knowledge to solve social problems

  • Many LMICs are assumed to have weak local research capacity and strong dependency on knowledge created in HICs, and RCD is justified on the need to assist these countries to produce and mobilize knowledge effectively and sustainably

Read more

Summary

26 May 2021 report

Low- and middle-income countries, science technology and innovation, knowledge production, cognitive justice, localisation, decolonial reflexivity

Introduction
Conclusions
Findings
Brown V

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.