Abstract
It is argued that indices purporting to measure the extent of cerebral lateralization of a task or function are not based on any foundation and therefore give a false sense of quantification of the underlying cerebral factors. The use of between-subject comparisons of laterality is thus regarded with great caution and certain procedures are recommended for analysing laterality data. An overestimation of the capacity of current laterality paradigms, and the lack of strong theory and understanding of hemispheric processes are seen to be the main reasons for this state of affairs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
