Abstract
The neutrino masses are one of the most important open problems in particle physics. Presently major efforts are underway to measure the electron antineutrino-mass by the triton beta decay [] and the effective Majorana neutrino mass by the double beta decay []. The best way to determine the neutrino mass by electron capture was assumed to be in . The total decay energy of the excited daughter atom has for all excitations the same upper energy limit of the Q-value minus the mass of the electron neutrino. Recently Robertson [] claimed, that the excitation of the two-hole states makes the determination of the neutrino mass by this method practically impossible. But Faessler and Simkovic [] showed, that the influence of the two-hole states is less than 1% near the Q-value, the area relevant for the determination of the neutrino mass. Even weaker are the contributions of the three-hole states []. The upper end of the calorimetric deexcitation spectrum of Dy is dominated by the highest energy one-hole resonance. With a Lorentzian profile of this resonance one has to fit after including the experimental sensitivity four parameters: (1) the neutrino mass, (2) the Q-value, (3) the width of the resonance and (4) its strength. This contribution discusses the problems of the determination of the neutrino mass by electron capture in . The conclusion of this work is, that the determination of the electron neutrino mass by electron capture in is difficult, but (probably) not impossible.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.