Abstract

OBJECTIVES:Currently, cochlear implant procedures are becoming increasingly broad and have greatly expanded. Bilateral cochlear implants and cochlear implants are more frequently applied in children. Our hypothesis is that the video head impulse test may be more sensitive than the caloric test in detecting abnormal vestibular function before cochlear implant surgery. The objective of this study was to compare the video head impulse test and caloric test results of patients selected for cochlear implant procedures before surgery.METHODS:The patients selected for cochlear implant surgery were submitted to a bithermal caloric test and video head impulse test.RESULTS:By comparing angular slow phase velocity values below 5° in the bithermal caloric test (hypofunction) and video head impulse test with a gain lower than 0.8, we identified 37 (64.9%) patients with vestibular hypofunction or canal paresis and 21 (36.8%) patients with abnormal video head impulse test gain before the cochlear implant procedure. Of the 37 patients with caloric test vestibular hypofunction, 20 (54%) patients exhibited an abnormal gain in the video head impulse test.CONCLUSION:The caloric test is more sensitive than the video head impulse test (Fisher's exact test, p=0.0002) in detecting the impaired ear before cochlear implant delivery. The proportion of caloric test/video head impulse test positive identification of abnormal vestibular function or caloric test/video head impulse test sensitivity was 1.8:1.

Highlights

  • Cochlear implants (CI) were first developed over 30 years ago to achieve hearing rehabilitation in patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss

  • The CI procedure could lead to vestibular function impairment because its mechanism of neural electrical stimulation may be potentially harmful to the vestibular end-organs [5]

  • Thirty-seven abnormal caloric tests and 21 abnormal video head impulse test (vHIT) tests were found among our 114-ear sample

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cochlear implants (CI) were first developed over 30 years ago to achieve hearing rehabilitation in patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss. Some patients have a tendency to present vestibular disorders since a common aetiology could target both systems [1]. Approximately 50% of CI recipients present abnormal vestibular function before the procedure [2,3,4]. The CI procedure could lead to vestibular function impairment because its mechanism of neural electrical stimulation may be potentially harmful to the vestibular end-organs [5].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call