Abstract
ObjectiveTo analyze the quality of information recorded in medical records, with an emphasis on foot care guidance for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. DesignCross-sectional multicenter study. SettingFour primary care centers in Ecuador. ParticipantsMedical records of 489 randomly selected individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Main measurementsOutcome variable: recording of care in four sections of the medical record: anamnesis, physical examination, complementary tests, and comprehensive evaluation. Explanatory variables: health center, age, and sex. Proportions and adjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated using logistic regression with their confidence intervals. ResultsOf the 489 medical records, 57.9% were women. Twenty-three percent had no record of medical control, 98.2% lacked a podiatric assessment, 3.1% included an eye fundus exam, 4.3% had an electrocardiogram, and 7.6% had a psychosocial interconsultation. Being an older adult was associated with a higher likelihood of recording comorbidities (OR = 1.9), foot physical examination (OR = 1.7), neurological evaluation (OR = 2.9), and complementary tests (creatinine OR = 1.5, cholesterol OR = 1.8). ConclusionThe study reveals poor quality in the clinical information recorded for individuals with diabetes, especially in podiatric assessments and the ordering of complementary tests. Older adults showed more complete records, highlighting the need to improve the consistency of care and recording for all patients. It is crucial to implement strategies that strengthen foot care guidance and the integrity of clinical records in the management of diabetes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.