Abstract

Imaging faint objects, such as exoplanets or disks, around nearby stars is extremely challenging because host star images are dominated by the telescope diffraction pattern. Using a coronagraph is an efficient solution for removing diffraction but requires an incoming wavefront with good quality to maximize starlight rejection. On the ground, the most advanced exoplanet imagers use extreme adaptive optics (ExAO) systems that are based on a deformable mirror (DM) with a large number of actuators to efficiently compensate for high-order aberrations and provide diffraction-limited images. While several exoplanet imagers with DMs using ∼1500 actuators are now routinely operating on large telescopes to observe gas giant planets, future systems may require a tenfold increase in the number of degrees of freedom to look for rocky planets. In this paper, we explore wavefront correction with a secondary adaptive optics system that controls a very large number of degrees of freedom that are not corrected by the primary ExAO system. Using Marseille Imaging Testbed for High Contrast (MITHiC), we implement a second stage of adaptive optics with ZELDA, a Zernike wavefront sensor, and a spatial light modulator to compensate for the phase aberrations of the bench downstream residual aberrations from adaptive optics. We demonstrate that their correction up to 137 cycles per pupil with nanometric accuracy is possible, provided there is a simple distortion calibration of the pupil and a moderate wavefront low-pass filtering. We also use ZELDA for a fast compensation of ExAO residuals, showing its promising implementation as a second-stage correction for the observation of rocky planets around nearby stars. Finally, we present images with a classical Lyot coronagraph on MITHiC and validate our ability to reach its theoretical performance with our calibration.

Highlights

  • Imaging extrasolar planets is one of the most demanding endeavors in astronomy today

  • Adaptive optics (AO) systems have been developed with a wavefront sensor (WFS) and a deformable mirror (DM) to measure and compensate for the aberrations introduced by the atmosphere in real time, leading to images at nearly the theoretical resolution limit (e.g., Beuzit et al 1997; Herriot et al 1998; Rousset et al 2003; Roddier 2004)

  • It is crucial to investigate the wavefront correction possibilities that are offered with a very large number of degrees of freedom. To handle this new range of high-order spatial frequencies, we explore the use of a second-stage AO system, including a Zernike wavefront sensor (ZWFS) and a spatial light modulator (SLM) implemented downstream from the first extreme adaptive optics (ExAO) system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Imaging extrasolar planets is one of the most demanding endeavors in astronomy today. The latest generation of high-contrast imaging instruments, such as the Very Large Telescope (VLT) Spectro-Polarimetric High-contrast Exoplanet REsearch (SPHERE; Beuzit et al 2019), Gemini Planet Image (GPI; Macintosh et al 2014), and the Subaru Coronagraphic Extreme Adaptive Optics (SCExAO; Jovanovic et al 2015), include novel extreme adaptive optics (ExAO) These systems are characterized by a wavefront correction with a high temporal frequency, up to 3.5 kHz, and a DM with a large number of actuators, up to 40 across the telescope pupil diameter. A phase screen manufactured by SILIOS Technologies is used to introduce various types of aberration patterns that are typically encountered in large optical telescopes It includes both static patterns and two continuous rings of simulated residual turbulence for VLT/SPHERE and the ELT High Angular Resolution – Monolithic – Optical and Nearinfrared – Integral field spectrograph (HARMONI; Vigan et al 2016b). The camera can be used to image the coronagraphic signal either in the focal plane or in the pupil plane with an optional lens

Principle of wavefront correction in a closed loop
Phase computation with ZELDA
Aberration compensation on MITHiC
Compensation for the geometrical distortions
Low-pass filtering
Results
Static aberrations
Temporal error analysis with residual ExAO aberrations
Impact on coronagraphic images
Conclusion
Second-stage AO
Telescope and ExAO
Coronagraphic imaging
Control computer
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call