Abstract
Several authors have documented the poor performance of usual large-sample, individual calibration confidence intervals based on a single run of an immunoassay. Inaccuracy of these intervals may be attributed to the paucity of information on model parameters available in a single run. Methods for combining information from multiple runs to estimate assay response variance parameters and to refine characterization of the standard curve for the current run via empirical Bayes techniques have been proposed. We investigate formally the utility of these techniques for improving the quality of routine individual calibration inference.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
