Abstract
The predictive capabilities of three transport-type turbulence models are analyzed by comparing predictions with experimental data obtained for fully developed turbulent flow in a square duct (Case 1) and in a 2:1 aspect ratio rectangular duct (Case 2), each with two opposite rib-roughened walls. The models include the Demuren-Rodi (DR) k- ϵ model, the Sugiyama et al. (S) k- ϵ model, and the differential stress (DS) model proposed recently by the authors. For Case 1, the S model is unable to predict experimentally observed axial mean velocity distortion induced by secondary flow in the cross plane. For both test cases, the DR and DS models exhibit similar levels of performance, except in the vicinity of a corner formed by the juncture of adjacent smooth and rib-roughened walls, where the DS model outperforms the DR model. The results are analyzed to explain why the DR model leads to the formation of a spurious secondary flow cell near this corner that is not present in the experimental flow.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.