Abstract

Dear Editor, We thank Dr. Pierre J. Marie for his interest in our recent study demonstrating that strontium ranelate (SrR) does not stimulate bone formation in ovariectomized (OVX) rats [1], and we appreciate this opportunity to respond. SrR has been found to be effective in reducing nonvertebral [2, 3] and vertebral [3–5] fractures in postmenopausal women. It has been proposed that SrR acts as a dual-acting agent with both antiresorptive and anabolic actions; however, whether it does both remains unclear. Our study was designed to address this issue. Dr. Marie raises an important point regarding the clinical relevance of the SrR doses used in our animal study (25 and 150 mg/kg). There is no universally accepted means of establishing clinical dose equivalency when exploring the effects of pharmaceutical agents in animal models. One common approach is to normalize drug dose by body mass (i.e., on a milligrams per kilogram basis). Based on this, the 25-mg/kg SrR dose we used is comparable to the 2-g/day dose in postmenopausal women (equates to 29–40 mg/day for 50–70 kg body mass). Clinically equivalent doses can also be calculated based on metabolic dose using the Osteoporos Int (2008) 19:1815–1817 DOI 10.1007/s00198-008-0741-9

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.