Abstract

Current trends in the industry go towards individualised parts in high volume production. Facing the high amount of different parts, efficient processes with a high flexibility are necessary. Within this context, laser-based additive manufacturing of metal parts become more important. These processes enable the production of individual geometries using a variety of metal materials. However, main challenges of this technology are rough surfaces, limited geometric precision and varying material properties. Therefore machining after the additive manufacturing process is a common approach for improving surface quality and geometric accuracy. However, the machining process affects the grain structure at the edges of the part. Using forming instead leads to a deformation of the grains but does not create new interfaces. Furthermore, the material properties can be improved due to work hardening and fibre flow. Within this work, a bulk metal forming process of an additively manufactured element of stainless steel 316L will be analysed. The aim of the investigation is a fundamental understanding of the forming behaviour and the material flow of an additively built metal part compared to the conventionally manufactured material. Therefore mechanical properties of both materials will be identified by upsetting tests. Additionally, fibre flow and Vickers hardness before and after the forming operation are analysed. It is detected that the forming behaviour of the additively manufactured material is strongly influenced by the layer-wise building process.

Highlights

  • A current trend in the industry is an increasing variety and the individualization of products on costumers desires

  • Current trends in the industry go towards individualised parts in high volume production

  • Machining after the additive manufacturing process is a common approach for improving surface quality and geometric accuracy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A current trend in the industry is an increasing variety and the individualization of products on costumers desires. This leads to shorter product life cycles and the necessity of highly flexible processes to face the quick changes of the product development. Within this context, laser-based additive manufacturing processes have become more important in the last few decades and changed from a prototyping technology to a production technology [1]. The assumption of infinitesimal layers is idealised for real manufacturing processes. The layer thickness is influenced by process parameters like e.g. the size of the powder or the recoating process

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call