Abstract

A growing body of evidence supports the association between the built environment and children walking to school (WTS), but few studies have compared WTS behaviors in cities of different sizes. This case-comparison study utilized WTS data from fourth graders in the small city of Manhattan, KS, USA (N = 171, from all eight schools) and data from fourth graders in the large city of Austin, TX, USA (N = 671 from 19 stratified-sampled schools). The same survey instrument was used in both locations. After controlling for socioeconomic and demographic variables, built environment, neighborhood, and attitudinal differences were demonstrated by the odds ratios for WTS in the small city vs. the large city. WTS in the small city was more likely to be associated with walking paths/trails and sidewalk landscape buffers en route to school despite lower perceived neighborhood social cohesion, school bus availability, and parental concerns about crime, compared to WTS in the large city. Also, the small city lacked key pedestrian infrastructure elements that were present in the large city. This study highlights important differences related to WTS behaviors and, thus, provides key insights for encouraging WTS in cities of different sizes.

Highlights

  • Walking to school (WTS) is a daily routine behavior among school children that can help establish an active lifestyle from early childhood

  • More than 50% of parents for both groups reported that school was close enough for their children to walk, with no significant differences (54.8% for the large city vs. 53.8% for the small city; p = 0.816), but the average travel time was less by 1 min 50 s for children in the small city (9.29 min as compared to 11.13 min)

  • We examined what affects the choice to WTS in a small city in contrast to a large city through case-comparison

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Walking to school (WTS) is a daily routine behavior among school children that can help establish an active lifestyle from early childhood. Empirical investigations have shown that environmental factors affect WTS: distance, travel time, safety, urban form and density, land use, and street design (i.e., speed limit, traffic volume, sidewalk, crosswalk, street connectivity) [12, 17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Such studies have focused primarily on large cities or statewide cross-sectional settings. Rural–urban comparisons of WTS among US children have increased [24,25,26], but such studies

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call