Abstract
An organization must evaluate its internal ability to optimize the benefits of BIM. Hence, it is important to provide a set of numerical weights for each performance metric before starting the evaluation. Hence, this study applies the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique to assign weights for the organizational BIM performance evaluation. The AHP survey was collected using self-completion method and received feedback from twenty (20) respondents. Findings from AHP Survey were analyzed using AHP Excel Template. This analysis has set a weighting value for each metric. As a result of using the AHP technique, the consistency value (CR) of all metrics determined was less than 0.1, which indicates that the experts' decisions were consistent. In addition, the value of consensus also exceeds 50 %, which confirms that the agreement on the value of metric weights among the experts is acceptable. Subsequently, the AHP had successfully assigned the weightage to all BIM performance metrics, with five (5) Main Metrics as the most critical metrics; Policy (37%), Process (17%), Technology (16%), People (15%), and Organization (15%).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
