Abstract

Today there are many multicriteria evaluation methods used in building projects. They enable to make component (complex) evaluations of the task. Before a multicriteria evaluation of building facade complex process we develop a technological network model which represents technological systems and work performance variants graphically. We use technological network model junctions “cut” method for finding faster final result, for reducing alternative decisions number and facilitating calculations. This method permits to reject not irrational variants from calculations. Facade painting model consists of the following partial processes: surface preparing, priming, putting and painting. Making multicriteria decisions synthesis all these processes are interpreted as stages. It's necessary to determine the importance of each stage with respect to another stage (stage significance). To find stage significance it's possible to use expert, pair comparison methods, etc. Each stage consists of a certain number of alternatives. For comparison and evaluation of these alternatives, we produce a system of criteria (technical-economical indicators and qualitative characteristics). Using technological network junctions “cut” method, decision multistage synthesis method and carrying out multicriteria evaluation, it is possible to make a more precise alternative decisions analysis, evaluating the stage significance. This is very important for customers, contractors, projectors, etc.

Highlights

  • Before a multicriteria evaluation of building facade complex process we develop a technological network model which represents technological systems and work performance variants graphically

  • Research interests: technology and organization of building work, building solutions technological modelling, multicriteria analysis

Read more

Summary

BUILDING FACADE PAINTING COMPLEX PROCESS MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION

Tyrimtt tikslas - taikant technologinio tinklinio modelio mazgtt ,ispjovimo" [7] bei daugiakriterinio vertinimo daugiapakopes sintezes metodus [1, 3], rasti pastatq fasadtt dazymo kompleksinio proceso racionaltt variantll_. Taikant si metod~t yra sprendziami tokie uzdaviniai: 1) sprendimq priemimui paruosiami pradiniai duomenys, 2) sudaromi ir pateikiami galimi sprendimo variantai, 3) atliekama analize ir isrikiuojami gauti variantai paga Kbit kriterijq. Taikant daugiapakopes sintezes metod!l pirmiausia nustatomi daliniq procesq racionaliis variantai, ve1iau sudaromi komp1eksinio proceso variantai ir daugiakriterinis ivertinimas atliekamas analogiskai. 4. TTM mazgq ,ispjovimo" ir sprendimq daugiapakopes sintezes metodq praktinis pritaikymas tinkuotq fasadq dazymo kompleksinio proceso daugiakriteriniam vertinimui. Remiantis TTM mazgq ispjovimo ir sprendimq daugiapakopes sintezes metodais tinkuotq fasadq dazymo kompleksinio proceso daugiakriterinis vertinimas atliekamas tokiais etapais: 1. Suformuojami kompleksinio proceso deriniq variantai ir atliekamas daugiakriterinis vertinimas, remiantis anksciau aprasytu daugiapakopes sintezes modeliu, kai ivertinama pakopq svarba.

Kriterijaus optimalumas min min max max
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call