Abstract

BackgroundThe fast growth of global health initiatives (GHIs) has raised concerns regarding achievement of coherence and synergy among distinct, complementary and sometimes competing activities. Herein, we propose an approach to compare GHIs with regard to their main purpose and operational aspects, using the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR/WHO) as a case study. The overall goal is to identify synergies and optimize efforts to provide solutions to reduce the burden of diseases.MethodsTwenty-six long-established GHIs were identified from among initiatives previously associated/partnered with TDR/WHO. All GHIs had working streams that would benefit from linking to the capacity building or implementation research focus of TDR. Individual profiles were created using a common template to collect information on relevant parameters. For analytical purposes, GHIs were simultaneously clustered in five and eight groups according to their ‘intended outcome’ and ‘operational framework’, respectively. A set of specific questions was defined to assess coherence/alignment against a TDR reference profile by attributing a score, which was subsequently averaged per GHI cluster. GHI alignment scores for intended outcome were plotted against scores for operational framework; based on the analysis of coherence/alignment with TDR functions and operations, a risk level (high, medium or low) of engagement was attributed to each GHI.ResultsThe process allowed a bi-dimensional ranking of GHIs with regards to how adequately they fit with or match TDR features and perspectives. Overall, more consistence was observed with regard to the GHIs’ main goals and expected outcomes than with their operational aspects, reflecting the diversity of GHI business models. Analysis of coherence indicated an increasing common trend for enhancing the engagement of developing country stakeholders, building research capacity and optimization of knowledge management platforms in support of improved access to healthcare.ConclusionsThe process used offers a broader approach that could be adapted by other GHIs to build coherence and synergy with peer organizations and helps highlight the potential contribution of each GHI in the new era of sustainable development goals. Emerging opportunities and new trends suggest that engagement between GHIs should be selective and tailored to ensure efficient collaborations.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0062-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • The fast growth of global health initiatives (GHIs) has raised concerns regarding achievement of coherence and synergy among distinct, complementary and sometimes competing activities

  • While some GHIs work as financing instruments, most initiatives focus on advocacy, coordination, technical support, and in research and product development

  • This paper offers a systematic review of key GHIs, looking at how they relate and complement TDR, to assist in better-informed strategic choices

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The fast growth of global health initiatives (GHIs) has raised concerns regarding achievement of coherence and synergy among distinct, complementary and sometimes competing activities. Some global health initiatives (GHIs) were established in response to the Millennium Development Goal. While some GHIs work as financing instruments, most initiatives focus on advocacy, coordination, technical support, and in research and product development. They open up a health development space and engage an increasing number of new actors and roles in global health for the benefit of poor populations [5]. TDR has progressively shifted its strategic emphasis from supporting basic biomedical research and product development toward applied field research and implementation/ operational research, addressing issues related to access and scaling-up of interventions in a range of povertyrelated diseases affecting neglected populations. Current core working areas of TDR are capacity building, knowledge management, implementation research, and research in support of neglected tropical disease control

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call