Abstract

Simple SummaryHorse owners and caregivers are ideally placed to inform equine researchers about the training, management and behaviour of their horses, and online surveys are a simple and easy way to collect this information. However, as potential survey respondents may need some incentive to engage in detailed surveys, we investigated the popularity of four potential no-cost tools to compensate survey participants for their time. While our inquiry found at least one of these tools would be of benefit to most participants, it also revealed the need to improve horse riders’ and handlers’ access to scientific findings.Over the last decade, equitation scientists have increasingly relied on online survey tools to gather information on horse training, management, behaviour and other equine-related subjects. With a detailed knowledge of their animals, horse owners and riders are ideally placed to contribute to research but are sometimes reluctant to engage with and devote time to surveys. The current article reveals, through consultation with stakeholder groups, the potential of a range of motivational items to boost horse-owner participation. A short, three-question inquiry was developed to rank respondents’ (n = 747) preferred survey tools and other items designed to engage the equestrian community with the donation of data. Respondents were asked to assign themselves to one of four categories: academics/researchers, professionals, practitioners and enthusiasts. The inquiry offered respondents the choice of three hypothetical tools: a standardised tool to measure behaviour over time; a logbook tool to record training and behaviour on a regular basis; and a chart to compare an individual horse’s behaviour with that of the general horse population. While analysis revealed that stakeholders considered at least one of the tools to be useful, it also exposed significant differences among the perceived usefulness of the various tools themselves. Using free-text responses, participants described the challenges faced when gathering information on horse training, management and behaviour. Qualitative analysis of these data revealed the need to improve the current dissemination of scientific findings to bridge various knowledge gaps. The Equine Behavior Assessment and Research Questionnaire (E-BARQ) is a longitudinal instrument that investigates horse training and management practices and permits an analysis of their relationship with behaviour. The current stakeholder consultation contributed to the final version of the E-BARQ questionnaire, identified incentivising items that can be offered to putative E-BARQ respondents, guided the eventual selection of a Share-&-Compare feedback chart, and reinforced the need for open-access dissemination of findings.

Highlights

  • Horse behaviour and the bond formed between horses and humans have been the subjects of fascination since ancient times

  • When asked about the perceived usefulness of the offered tools, stakeholder groups varied in their choices

  • The current results support the use of incentives because significantly more respondents indicated that at least one of the motivational items offered was appealing than who nominated none of the items

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Horse behaviour and the bond formed between horses and humans have been the subjects of fascination since ancient times. The ways we train and manage horses are reflected in and reflective of their behaviour [1], which in turn, affects horse welfare and human safety. Behavioural issues are considered the main reason for wastage among riding horses, where horses are sold-on or euthanised because they become difficult to handle or ride, thereby jeopardising handler and rider safety [2]. Improved horse management and training practices increase the prevalence of desirable behaviour and positive welfare outcomes [3,4]. To make meaningful and enduring inroads into improving rider safety and horse welfare, we first need to understand how horses’ current and historic training and management practices influence behavioural responses

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call