Abstract

Since more than thirty years, the European Cohesion Policy aims to reduce economic disparities and support regional development by funding local-orientated projects. However, the citizens’ awareness of Cohesion Policy follows an unexpected longitudinal pattern characterised by a notable decrease after an initial increase. Although researchers have been investigating the relationship between policy implementation and public awareness, a lack of systemic comprehension of the underlying mechanisms is evident. Using system dynamics, we develop a causal model to explain the roots of the declining awareness towards policy interventions. The findings highlight how citizens initially manifest a high collective attention to Cohesion Policy that tends to decay over time. These dynamics, combined with the citizens’ inherent tendency to lose information saved in their long-term individual memory, could elucidate the system's behaviour. This novel system dynamics application provides policy-makers with operational guidelines for developing efficient communication strategies to improve policy awareness.

Highlights

  • A negative perception of organisations may undermine the citizens’ support and trust (Ecker-Ehrhardt, 2012; Mishler & Rose, 2001) and, overall, institutional legitimacy and acceptance (Mazerolle, Antrobus, Bennett & Tyler, 2013; Schmidt, 2013)

  • People getting aware (“total citizens getting aware of European Union (EU) role in cohesion policy”); citizens receive constant inputs of projects funded by the EU (“total number of citizens informed on EU role in cohesion policy”), their receptivity to these inputs changes dynamically, depending on the “collective attention on cohesion policy”

  • A future extension including the dynamic pattern of the “total number of citizens informed on EU role in cohesion policy”, which will be feasible in case data about the impact of CP communication will be available, could potentially provide additional meaningful insights about the CP awareness system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A negative perception of organisations may undermine the citizens’ support and trust (Ecker-Ehrhardt, 2012; Mishler & Rose, 2001) and, overall, institutional legitimacy and acceptance (Mazerolle, Antrobus, Bennett & Tyler, 2013; Schmidt, 2013). The European Union (EU) institutions are challenged on a daily basis by euroskeptical movements (Brack & Startin, 2015; Usherwood & Startin, 2013) to the extent that public support towards European institutions is drastically declining and the integrity of the Union is endangered (Leruth, Gänzle & Trondal, 2019; Vollaard, 2014; Webber, 2019) To this end, even if the EU has increased its communication effort (Barberio, Kuric, Mollona & Pareschi, 2017; Caliendo & Iannarino, 2009), the understanding of how to in-. Emphasis has been placed on the manner in which public policies, especially in terms of public expenditure, and their communication (Barberio et al, 2017; Karens, Eshuis, Klijn & Voets, 2016) affect the citizens’ perception and support towards institutions (Barberio et al, 2017; Barberio, Kuric, Mollona & Pareschi, 2018; Dellmuth & Chalmers, 2018 )

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call