Abstract

The failure stress under four-point bending cannot be considered as an intrinsic material property because of the well-known size effect of increasing maximum flexural stress with decreasing specimen size. In this work, four-point bending tests are analyzed with the coupled criterion for different sample sizes. The maximum flexural stress only tends towards the material tensile strength provided the specimen height is large enough as compared to the material characteristic length. In that case, failure is mainly driven by a stress criterion. Failure of smaller specimens is driven both by energy and stress conditions, thus depending on the material tensile strength and fracture toughness. Regardless of the material mechanical properties, we show that the variation of the ratio of maximum flexural stress to strength as a function of the ratio of specimen height to material characteristic length follows a master curve, for which we propose an analytical expression. Based on this relation, we propose a procedure for the post-processing of four-point bending tests that allows determining both the material tensile strength and fracture toughness. The procedure is illustrated based on four-point bending experiments on three gypsum at different porosity fractions.

Highlights

  • Size effect refers to the influence of the characteristic structure dimension on the nominal failure stress

  • The maximum flexural stress at failure under four-point bending, sometimes called flexural strength, cannot be considered as an intrinsic material property because of the well-known size effect leading to increasing maximum flexural stress with decreasing specimen size

  • This size effect can be reproduced using the coupled criterion (CC) which allows the prediction of the failure force and the initiation crack length for given specimen geometry and material properties

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Size effect refers to the influence of the characteristic structure dimension on the nominal failure stress. Considering four-point bending as a matter of example, it is usually observed experimentally that the smaller the specimen the larger the maximum flexural stress An explanation of this size effect relying on the weakest link theory was introduced by Weibull (Weibull 1939; Weibull 1949; Weibull 1951), based on the idea that failure is driven by flaws inside the materials and that the larger the specimen, the larger the probability for a large flaw to exist in the specimen. This approach was later on justified based on statistical distribution of microscopic flaws. Another objection to this purely statistical approach is that it does not contain any material characteristic length (Bažant 1999)

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.