Abstract

Conserving animals and plants in fire-prone landscapes requires evidence of how fires affect modified ecosystems. Despite progress on this front, fire ecology is restricted by a dissonance between two dominant paradigms: ‘fire mosaics’ and ‘functional types’. The fire mosaic paradigm focuses on animal responses to fire events and spatial variation, whereas the functional type paradigm focuses on plant responses to recurrent fires and temporal variation. Fire management for biodiversity conservation requires input from each paradigm because animals and plants are interdependent and influenced by spatial and temporal dimensions of fire regimes. We propose that better integration of animal-based and plant-based approaches can be achieved by identifying common metrics that describe changes in multiple taxa; linking multiple components of the fire regime with animal and plant data; understanding plant-animal interactions; and incorporating spatial and temporal characteristics of fires into conservation management. Our vision for a more integrated fire ecology could be implemented via a collaborative and global network of research and monitoring sites, where measures of animals and plants are linked to real-time data on fire regimes.

Highlights

  • Historical fire regimes have shaped biodiversity, but conserving animals and plants in contemporary landscapes requires evidence of how fires affect ecosystems that are modified by and subject to new threats [1]

  • Progress has been made on this front, fire ecology is still restricted by a dissonance between two dominant paradigms that differ in theory and application: ‘fire mosaics’ and ‘functional types’ [2]

  • We propose that betterand isolation: it requires input from each because animals and plants are both of value, interdependent, integration of animal-based and plant-based approaches can be We achieved bythat identifying common of influenced by the spatial and temporal dimensions of fire regimes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Historical fire regimes have shaped biodiversity, but conserving animals and plants in contemporary landscapes requires evidence of how fires affect ecosystems that are modified by and subject to new threats [1]. The fire mosaic paradigm focuses on animal responses to fire events Fire management under this paradigm typically aims to create spatially diverse fire mosaics to promote biodiversity or the persistence of a small number of focal species [3]. InFire isolation: it requires input from each because animals and are both of value, either interdependent, management for biodiversity conservation cannot beplants achieved by applying paradigm in and influenced by the spatial and temporal dimensions of fire regimes. We propose that betterand isolation: it requires input from each because animals and plants are both of value, interdependent, integration of animal-based and plant-based approaches can be We achieved bythat identifying common of influenced by the spatial and temporal dimensions of fire regimes. Incorporating spatial and temporal characteristics of fires into conservation management

Animal andand
Taxonomic Focus
Measures of Fire
Mode of Generalization
Management Emphasis
Towards a More Integrated Fire Ecology
Common Measures of Biodiversity
Multiple Components of Fire Regimes
Shared Mechanisms
Spatio-Temporal Fire Management
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call