Abstract

Recently Byrski et al. reported the first-ever breast cancer (BC) study, which specifically selected BRCA1-carriers for the neoadjuvant treatment and used monotherapy by cisplatin instead of conventional schemes. Although the TNM staging of the recruited patients was apparently more favorable than in most of published neoadjuvant trials, the results of Byrski et al. clearly outperform any historical data. Indeed, 9 of 10 BRCA1-associated BC demonstrated complete pathological response to the cisplatin treatment, i.e. these women have good chances to be ultimately cured from the cancer disease. High sensitivity of BRCA1-related tumors to platinating agents has been discussed for years, but it took almost a decade to translate convincing laboratory findings into first clinical observations. With increasing stratification of tumor disease entities for molecular subtypes and rapidly growing armamentarium of cancer drugs, it is getting technically and ethically impossible to subject all promising treatment options to the large randomized prospective clinical trials. Therefore, alternative approaches for initial drugs evaluation are highly required, and one of the choices is to extract maximum benefit from already available collections of biological material and medical charts. For example, many thousands of BC patients around the world have already been subjected to second- or third-line therapy with platinum agents, but the association between BRCA status and response to the treatment has not been systematically evaluated in these women. While potential biases of retrospective studies are widely acknowledged, it is frequently ignored that the use of archival collections may provide preliminary answers for long-standing questions within days instead of years. However, even elegantly-designed, small-sized, hypothesis-generating retrospective studies may require multicenter efforts and somewhat cumbersome logistics, that may explain the surprising lack of historical data on the platinum-based treatment of BC in BRCA1 carriers.

Highlights

  • On July 23, 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment journal released an electronic publication ahead of print of the first-ever breast cancer (BC) study, which selected BRCA1-carriers for the neoadjuvant treatment and used monotherapy by cisplatin instead of conventional schemes [1]

  • Selection of BRCA1 carriers for the trial possesses a problem because of rarity of BRCA1-associated BC and high cost of BRCA1 testing. These difficulties are reflected by ongoing randomized trial on BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, whose breast cancer disease progressed after adjuvant or palliative anthracycline-based therapy http://www.geneticbreastcancer trial.usilu.net/

  • Many thousands of BC patients around the world have already been subjected to second- or third-line therapy with platinum agents, but BRCA status has not been systematically evaluated in these women

Read more

Summary

Introduction

On July 23, 2008, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment journal released an electronic publication ahead of print of the first-ever breast cancer (BC) study, which selected BRCA1-carriers for the neoadjuvant treatment and used monotherapy by cisplatin instead of conventional schemes [1]. The results of the this exploratory trial are absolutely fascinating: 9 out of 10 patients experienced complete pathologic tumor response, so these women are expected to be relapse-free for a prolonged period of time or, hopefully, forever

Discussion
Findings
Conclusion
Kelland L
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call