Abstract

A growing gap is emerging between the increase in human and organizational factors (HOF) expertise and the success of HOF operational approaches, and the rather weak influence of HOF at the strategic level of organizations. This chapter seeks to understand this paradox and identify some levers to promote HOF influence. We assume that (1) the paradox is an outcome of the “long road” of evolutions in HOF knowledge and its experts over forty years; (2) these evolutions have multiplied concepts and practices without a clear global coherence and without a political and institutional agenda; (3) breaking the HOF “glass ceiling” requires action on several levers at the conceptual level, the professional level, the management level and finally at political and institutional levels.

Highlights

  • It is widely accepted that industrial safety is not just a question of technical design and engineering

  • Academics have produced a significant amount of knowledge about human and organizational factors (HOF)

  • A set of HOF principles has been defined, and many concrete actions and programs have been successfully implemented at an operational level by emerging communities of HOF experts and practitioners

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is widely accepted that industrial safety is not just a question of technical design and engineering. A set of HOF principles has been defined, and many concrete actions and programs have been successfully implemented at an operational level by emerging communities of HOF experts and practitioners. Even in the most advanced companies, the dramatic development of HOF knowledge and practices has not really helped to increase the influence of HOF on the strategic and management decisions that could have a significant impact on safety. This lack of influence at the strategic and executive levels may have a negative feedback on HOF practices implemented at the operational level. This occurs every time a management tool is implemented, or a strategic decision is made that ignores

Journé or even contradicts HOF principles, meaning that HOF risk losing influence at all levels
The Evolution of HOF
The Glass Ceiling Paradox of HOF
Levers for an Influential HOF in Organizations
Academic and Conceptual Levers for Multiple but Coherent HOF Research and Knowledge Integration
Empirical Levers for Embedding HOF in Actual Organization Practices at All Levels
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.