Abstract
This thought-provoking paper explores the intriguing issue of Indonesia’s limited geographical jurisdiction concerning extradition treaty implementation. Extradition, the process of returning fugitives to face justice, is frequently impeded by complex legal obstacles stemming from a country’s membership in the United Nations and commitment to human rights principles and values. Due to their legal jurisdiction or concerns regarding human rights violations, many nations are not obligated to deliver over suspects, posing a unique difficulty for Indonesia. Nevertheless, there is optimism. International cooperation and the development of extradition agreements can serve as a road map for nations seeking to enhance their extradition practices. Countries can negotiate multilateral or regional agreements that satisfy the concerns and interests of all parties by comprehending the complexities of the extradition process, such as the list of extraditable offences and customary international law. Our paper suggests that nations investigate legal models and extradition treaties that offer viable solutions for overcoming these obstacles. By collaborating and sharing information, we can surmount obstacles to justice and ensure that fugitives face the consequences of their actions, regardless of where they hide.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
