Abstract
BackgroundGermline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancers. However, no association between BRCA1 germline mutation and glioblastoma malignancy has ever been highlighted.Here we report two cases of BRCA1 mutated patients who developed a glioblastoma multiform (GBM).Cases presentationTwo patients diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) were screened for BRCA1 germline mutation. They both carried a pathogenic mutation introducing a premature STOP codon in the exon 11 of the BRCA1 gene. Few years later, both patients developed a glioblastoma and a second breast cancer. In an attempt to clarify the role played by a mutated BRCA1 allele in the GBM development, we investigated the BRCA1 mRNA and protein expression in breast and glioblastoma tumours for both patients. The promoter methylation status of this gene was also tested by methylation specific PCR as BRCA1 expression is also known to be lost by this mechanism in some sporadic breast cancers.ConclusionOur data show that BRCA1 expression is maintained in glioblastoma at the protein and the mRNA levels, suggesting that loss of heterozygosity (LOH) did not occur in these cases. The protein expression is tenfold higher in the glioblastoma of patient 1 than in her first breast carcinoma, and twice higher in patient 2. In agreement with the high protein expression level in the GBM, BRCA1 promoter methylation was not observed in these tumours.In these two cases, despite of a BRCA1 pathogenic germline mutation, the tumour-suppressor protein expression is maintained in GBM, suggesting that the BRCA1 mutation is not instrumental for the GBM development.
Highlights
Germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancers
Our data show that BRCA1 expression is maintained in glioblastoma at the protein and the mRNA levels, suggesting that loss of heterozygosity (LOH) did not occur in these cases
In agreement with the high protein expression level in the glioblastoma multiform (GBM), BRCA1 promoter methylation was not observed in these tumours
Summary
Our study failed to establish any biological link between GBM and BRCA1 mutation but further genotype/phenotype studies might be needed to demonstrate or exclude any relation. It is possible to imagine that phenotype specificities could be linked with an increased risk of unusual cancers in BRCA1 mutated patients. Our two patients had mutations generating truncated proteins. Large studies are required to verify whether complete loss of function BRCA1 mutations or interactions with other genes could be associated with increased risk of rare cancers. Authors’ contributions MB carried out the molecular analysis, participated in the design of the study and drafted the manuscript. CJ participated in the design of the study and the writing of the manuscript. KS performed some molecular analysis and participated in the writing of the manuscript. VB and GJ conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have