Abstract
The diagnosis of brain death is primarily clinical. Sometimes ancillary tests are needed. This study compared sensitivity and interobserver agreement of the 10-, 7- and 4-point CT angiography scoring systems for the diagnosis of brain death in children. CT angiography examinations of 50 pediatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of brain death were evaluated according to 10-, 7- and 4-point scoring systems. Images were evaluated by two radiologists who considered the vessel opacification first in the arterial phase (A0-V50) and then in the venous phase (A0-V50). We evaluated interobserver agreement for the assessment of vessel opacification and diagnosis of brain death. We compared the differences among brain death diagnoses between children with craniotomy-craniectomy defects, open fontanelles and preserved bone integrity. We subdivided children into two groups according to age: ≤ 2years and > 2years. We calculated sensitivities according to age groups. Using the clinical exam as the reference standard, we found sensitivities for 10-, 7- and 4-point scoring systems to be 70%, 88% and 92% in the A0-V50 method and 40%, 82% and 82% in the A50-V50 method, respectively. Percentage agreement between readers was 78% for the 7-point scale using the A0-V50 method and more than 90% for other scoring systems for both the A0-V50 method and the A50-V50 method. The sensitivity was much lower in children with open anterior fontanelles compared to the groups with preserved bone integrity and with a craniotomy-craniectomy defect. Just as in adult age groups, in children the 4-point scale appears to be more sensitive than the 10- and 7-point scales for CT angiography-based assessment of brain death. Because the scoring systems have similar sensitivities, they could be used as ancillary tests in pediatric cases.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.