Abstract
AbstractThis article discusses the linguistic issues which are involved in the interpretation of Rev 20:4–5. It demonstrates that the aorist tense-form of ἔζησαν in v. 4 neither necessarily nor even likely here results in the inchoative reading favored by premillennialist interpreters. It also provides two readings of v. 5 which fit naturally with a non-inchoative reading.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have