Abstract

Abstract. We consider the flow of marine-terminating outlet glaciers that are laterally confined in a channel of prescribed width. In that case, the drag exerted by the channel side walls on a floating ice shelf can reduce extensional stress at the grounding line. If ice flux through the grounding line increases with both ice thickness and extensional stress, then a longer shelf can reduce ice flux by decreasing extensional stress. Consequently, calving has an effect on flux through the grounding line by regulating the length of the shelf. In the absence of a shelf, it plays a similar role by controlling the above-flotation height of the calving cliff. Using two calving laws, one due to Nick et al. (2010) based on a model for crevasse propagation due to hydrofracture and the other simply asserting that calving occurs where the glacier ice becomes afloat, we pose and analyse a flowline model for a marine-terminating glacier by two methods: direct numerical solution and matched asymptotic expansions. The latter leads to a boundary layer formulation that predicts flux through the grounding line as a function of depth to bedrock, channel width, basal drag coefficient, and a calving parameter. By contrast with unbuttressed marine ice sheets, we find that flux can decrease with increasing depth to bedrock at the grounding line, reversing the usual stability criterion for steady grounding line location. Stable steady states can then have grounding lines located on retrograde slopes. We show how this anomalous behaviour relates to the strength of lateral versus basal drag on the grounded portion of the glacier and to the specifics of the calving law used.

Highlights

  • In the theory of laterally unconfined marine ice sheet flow, a standard result is that flux through the grounding line is an increasing function of bedrock depth (Weertman, 1974; Thomas and Bentley, 1978; Schoof, 2007a)

  • This leads to the conclusion that grounding lines can have stable steady states only when the ice sheet bed has sufficiently steep downflow slope (Fowler, 2011; Schoof, 2012): a slight advance in grounding line position into deeper water leads to an increase in flux through the grounding line, causing the ice sheet to retreat back to its original position

  • Simulations of outlet glaciers in Greenland with this calving law have predicted stabilization of grounding lines on areas of upward-sloping bed (Nick et al, 2013), suggesting that it may predict a relationship between flux and bedrock depth that differs from theories for unconfined marine ice sheet flow

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the theory of laterally unconfined marine ice sheet flow, a standard result is that flux through the grounding line is an increasing function of bedrock depth (Weertman, 1974; Thomas and Bentley, 1978; Schoof, 2007a). Schoof et al.: Buttressed outlet glaciers (or “retrograde”) beds Both papers have channels of uniform width and fix the edge of the ice shelf, which suggests the following physics: for a steady-state grounding line on an upward-sloping bed, a slight retreat in grounding line position will cause an increase in ice thickness at the grounding line. Simulations of outlet glaciers in Greenland with this calving law have predicted stabilization of grounding lines on areas of upward-sloping bed (Nick et al, 2013), suggesting that it may predict a relationship between flux and bedrock depth that differs from theories for unconfined marine ice sheet flow. We anticipate that the analysis presented below can be applied to other calving models, but doing so is beyond the scope of our paper

Ice flow
Calving model
Floating 1
Non-dimensionalization
Direct numerical solution
A local-force-balance version of the model
The grounding line boundary layer
Solutions of the boundary layer problem
The role of extensional stress at the grounding line
Grounded calving fronts
Lateral drag and driving stress comparable
Floating calving fronts
The finite flux limit for large flotation thickness
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call