BORS/BJR TRAVELLING FELLOWSHIP: A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS ON BONE TISSUE OF TWO ULTRASONIC CUTTING DEVICES OPERATING AT DIFFERENT FREQUENCIES

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionUltrasonic cutting in surgery has great potential. However, a key limitation is heat created by friction between the bone and the blade. Bone has poor thermal conductivity which hinders the dissipation of heat, causing cell death near the cut site In addition, ultrasonic vibration may create microcracks. It was hypothesised that these effects on bone would vary with the frequency and displacement of the ultrasonically powered blade. Therefore varying frequencies and displacements of the tip of the blade were studied to find the combination with fewest microcracks and lowest temperature rise at the bone-tool interface.AimTo explore the effect of different frequencies and tip displacements of ultrasonic cutting devices on the amount of thermal and mechanical damage.MethodsIn vitro tests were conducted on fresh rat femoral shafts using two different frequencies; 20kHz and 35kHz.Two displacement amplitudes of two different frequencies were used: 23.9 μm (p-p) and 7.5 μm (p-p) both at 20kHz and 18.7 μm (p-p) and 27 μm (p-p) both at 35kHz and. Cooling was used to emulate clinical conditions. Histological examination (H & E and TUNEL) was performed to identify live and dead cells. Further rat femoral shafts (n=6) were exposed to the same number of cuts by each tool to identify any micro-damage induced by different electrical currents using Micro-CT and confocal Laser scanning microscope. All experimental data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Post Hoc multiple comparisons test. Differences between groups were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.ResultsThe cut site at 7.5 μm (p-p) in 20kHz displayed only indentation instead of a cut, and was excluded. Histological examination revealed a high incidence of cell death at the cutting edge, in both frequencies. At 35kHz and 27 μm (p-p) some charring was evident, while at 20kHz and 23.9 μm (p-p) more irregularities were seen on the surface of the cut indicating instability during cutting when this setting was used. In contrast, the 35kHz at 18.7 μm (p-p) resulted in a smoother cutting surface. The highest cell death percentage ranged from 25% (at 35kHz, 18.7 μm (p-p)) to 44 % (at 35kHz, 27 μm (p-p)). Most of the tool's effect was located within 25 µm of the cut surface. There was a significant decrease to < 5 % at 200 µm. No cell death was found over 200 µm from the cut surface in both frequencies (35 kHz and 20 kHz). No significant difference in total percentage cell death was found between cutting at 35kHz and 18.7 μm (p-p) and at 20kHz and 23.9 μm (p-p). No microcracks were detected along the depth of the cut site at either frequency.ConclusionOf the 2 ultrasonic cutting frequencies tested, the combination of the higher vibration frequency (35kHz) and the lower displacement amplitude (18.7 μm (p-p) demonstrated least damage to the bone tissue. No microcracks were displayed when using either of the ultrasonic cutting frequencies.Declaration of Interest(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.