Abstract
In his pioneering and now classic 1953 study, Nationalism and Social Communication, Karl Deutsch laid out a social science agenda for the study of national consciousness in contemporary and historic populations. Central to this agenda was communication, and central to communication was language: ‘If we knew how to compare and measure the ability of groups and cultures to transmit information, we might gain a better understanding of their behavior and capacities.’ (Deutsch 1966, 93). At that time historians were not paying attention to social scientists as neither historical demography nor social science history had yet been born, and Deutsch’s call remained unanswered. It took the study of the secular decline of fertility in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries to raise the question again for the European past. When Watkins concluded that: ‘those people who spoke a common language appeared to behave in similar ways with respect to reproduction, but they behaved quite differently from those with whom they could not communicate’ (Watkins 1991, 7), she offered one answer to Deutsch’s inquiry about social communication and social behaviour (see also: Lesthaeghe 1977; Knodel & van de Walle 1997, Watkins 1986; Anderson 1986).KeywordsFertility DeclineFertility TransitionFemale Labour Force ParticipationMarital FertilityFertility ControlThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call