Abstract

Two bootstrap-corrected variants of the Akaike information criterion are proposed for the purpose of small-sample mixed model selection. These two variants are asymptotically equivalent, and provide asymptotically unbiased estimators of the expected Kullback–Leibler discrepancy between the true model and a fitted candidate model. The performance of the criteria is investigated in a simulation study where the random effects and the errors for the true model are generated from a Gaussian distribution. The parametric bootstrap is employed. The simulation results suggest that both criteria provide effective tools for choosing a mixed model with an appropriate mean and covariance structure. A theoretical asymptotic justification for the variants is presented in the Appendix.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.