Bone Density Correlates With Depth of Subsidence After Expandable Interbody Cage Placement: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Abstract

Biomechanical analysis. To evaluate the depth of subsidence resulting from an expandable interbody cage at varying bone foam densities. Expandable interbody cages have been shown to be associated with increased rates of subsidence. It is critical to evaluate all variables which may influence a patient's risk of subsidence following the placement of an expandable interbody cage. In the first stage of the study, subsidence depth was measured with 1Nm of input expansion torque. In the second stage, the depth of subsidence was measured following 150 N output force exerted by an expandable interbody cage. Within each stage, different bone foam densities were analyzed, including 5, 10, 15, and 20 pounds per cubic foot (PCF). Five experimental trials were performed for each PCF material, and the mean subsidence depths were calculated. Trials which failed to reach 150 N output force were considered outliers and were excluded from the analysis. There was an overall decrease in subsidence depth with increasing bone foam density. The mean subsidence depths at 150 N output force were 2.0±0.3mm for 5 PCF, 1.8±0.2mm for 10 PCF, 1.1±0.2mm for 15 PCF, and 1.1±0.2mm for 20 PCF bone foam. The mean subsidence depths at 1Nm of input torque were 2.3±0.5mm for 5 PCF, 2.3±0.5mm for 10 PCF, 1.2±0.2mm for 15 PCF, and 1.1±0.1mm for 20 PCF bone foam. Depth of subsidence was negatively correlated with bone foam density at both constant input torque and constant endplate force. Because tactile feedback of cage expansion into the subsiding bone cannot be reliably distinguished from true expansion of disc space height, surgeons should take bone quality into account when deploying expandable cages.