Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro bond strength of adhesive and traditional composites to several materials that might be encountered in clinical practice. An adhesive composite, an adhesive composite with a bonding agent, and a traditional composite with a bonding agent were bonded to enamel, dentin, amalgam, porcelain, and nickel-chromium-beryllium (Ni-Cr-Be) alloy. Tensile bond strengths were determined after 24 hours storage at 23 degrees C or thermocycling. The use of an adhesive composite with a bonding agent resulted in increased bond strength to amalgam, porcelain, and dentin, but not to enamel or Ni-Cr-Be alloy at 23 degrees C, when compared with the adhesive composite alone. The adhesive composite with a bonding agent had higher bond strengths to amalgam, porcelain, and dentin than did the traditional composite with bonding agent, but not to enamel or Ni-Cr-Be alloy at 23 degrees C. The use of a bonding agent with an adhesive composite produced higher bond strengths than the adhesive composite alone. The traditional composite bonded better to enamel and Ni-Cr-Be alloy than did the adhesive composite. Thermocycling generally had no effect on bond strengths or increased them slightly.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
