Abstract

One of the major challenges in the post-genomic era is elucidating the genetic basis of human diseases. In recent years, studies have shown that polygenic risk scores (PRS), based on aggregated information from millions of variants across the human genome, can estimate individual risk for common diseases. In practice, the current medical practice still predominantly relies on physiological and clinical indicators to assess personal disease risk. For example, caregivers mark individuals with high body mass index (BMI) as having an increased risk to develop type 2 diabetes (T2D). An important question is whether combining PRS with clinical metrics can increase the power of disease prediction in particular from early life. In this work we examined this question, focusing on T2D. We present here a sex-specific integrated approach that combines PRS with additional measurements and age to define a new risk score. We show that such approach combining adult BMI and PRS achieves considerably better prediction than each of the measures on unrelated Caucasians in the UK Biobank (UKB, n = 290,584). Likewise, integrating PRS with self-reports on birth weight (n = 172,239) and comparative body size at age ten (n = 287,203) also substantially enhance prediction as compared to each of its components. While the integration of PRS with BMI achieved better results as compared to the other measurements, the latter are early-life measurements that can be integrated already at childhood, to allow preemptive intervention for those at high risk to develop T2D. Our integrated approach can be easily generalized to other diseases, with the relevant early-life measurements.

Highlights

  • Predicting the risk of an individual to develop a specific disease is a key challenge in clinical decision making [1]

  • We evaluated this approach by using both the polygenic risk scores (PRS) and physical measurements associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) prevalence (BMI, birth weight and comparative body size at age ten) to predict disease risk, based on the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort [26]

  • We focused on Caucasians by limiting the analysis to participants who self-reported themselves as White and being classified as Caucasians based on their genetic ancestry (Genetic ethnic group, data-field 22006)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Predicting the risk of an individual to develop a specific disease is a key challenge in clinical decision making [1]. The many variants that are below significance in GWAS, affect the trait, and cumulatively contribute to the phenotype even more than the relatively few statistically significant GWAS variants [8,9] In light of this possibility, different studies developed polygenic risk scores (PRS) that consider the accumulative effect of millions of genetic markers to predict the probability of an individual to develop a complex disease [1,10,11,12,13]. In this work we asked whether a combined approach that utilizes both genetic factors (e.g., PRS) and quantitative measures (that have non-genetic components) can improve disease prediction We evaluated this approach by using both the PRS and physical measurements associated with T2D prevalence (BMI, birth weight and comparative body size at age ten) to predict disease risk, based on the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort [26]. Our analysis includes early-life measurements, meaning that individuals at high risk can be identified early in life, leading to more effective intervention

Methods
Polygenic Risk Score Calculation
Composite Risk Score
Evaluation of the Results
PRS and BMI
PRS and Birth Weight
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call