Blue consequences of the green bioeconomy: Clear‐cutting intensifies the harmful impacts of land drainage on stream invertebrate biodiversity

Abstract

Abstract Growing bioeconomy is increasing the pressure to clear‐cut drained peatland forests. Yet, the cumulative effects of peatland drainage and clear‐cutting on the biodiversity of recipient freshwater ecosystems are largely unknown. We studied the isolated and combined effects of peatland drainage and clear‐cutting on stream macroinvertebrate communities. We further explored whether the impact of these forestry‐driven catchment alterations to benthic invertebrates is related to stream size. We quantified the impact on invertebrate biodiversity by comparing communities in forestry‐impacted streams to expected communities modelled with a multi‐taxon niche model. The impact of clear‐cutting of drained peatland forests exceeded the sum of the independent effects of drainage and clear‐cutting, indicating a synergistic interaction between the two disturbances in small streams. Peatland drainage reduced benthic biodiversity in both small and large streams, whereas clear‐cutting did the same only in small streams. Small headwater streams were more sensitive to forestry impacts than the larger downstream sites. We found 11 taxa (out of 25 modelled) to respond to forestry disturbances. These taxa were mainly different from those previously reported as sensitive to forestry‐driven alterations, indicating the context dependence of taxonomic responses to forestry. In contrast, most of the functional traits previously identified as responsive to agricultural sedimentation also responded to forestry pressures. In particular, taxa that live temporarily in hyporheic habitats, move by crawling, disperse actively in water, live longer than 1 year, use eggs as resistance form and obtain their food by scraping became less abundant than expected, particularly in streams impacted by both drainage and clear‐cutting. Synthesis and applications. Drained peatland forests in boreal areas are reaching maturity and will soon be harvested. Clear‐cutting of these forests incurs multiple environmental hazards but previous studies have focused on terrestrial ecosystems. Our results show that the combined impacts of peatland drainage and clear‐cutting may extend across ecosystem boundaries and cause significant biodiversity loss in recipient freshwater ecosystems. This information supports a paradigm shift in boreal forest management, whereby continuous‐cover forestry based on partial harvest may provide the most sustainable approach to peatland forestry.