Assessment of running waters (Slovakia) using benthic macroinvertebrates — derivation of ecological quality classes with respect to altitudinal gradients

Abstract

AbstractA method is presented for defining the five classes of ecological quality based on a multimetric index (MMI) of macroinvertebrates, as required for implementation of the Water Framework Directive for small (catchment area 10–100 km2), medium (101–1000 km2) and large (> 1000 km2) streams. Our method (expert judgment) allows us to overcome an absence of reference sites for some stream types. The key was selection of suitable metrics for all stream types. The whole procedure was divided into two parts. 1. Small streams with reference sites: suitable metrics were selected according to their ability to distinguish reference and monitoring sites — SI, Oligo [%], BMWP, RhiTI, Rheoindex, IBCR, % Aka+Lit+Psa [%] and EPT. Here the high-good boundary value was set as the 25th (for metrics decreasing with increasing pollution) or 75th percentile (for metrics increasing with increasing pollution). 2. Medium and large streams which lack reference sites: here the idea was applied that some metrics, the values of which change along an altitudinal gradient, also react to anthropogenic stress — SI, Oligo [%], BMWP, [%] metarhithral, RhiTI, Aka+Lit+Psa [%] and EPT for both medium and large streams with, in addition, IBCR and NFam for medium streams. This assumption was supported by regression analysis of altitude and metrics from small streams. Not all the metrics were related to altitude but metrics with a good ability to separate reference and monitoring sites did show a significant relationship to altitude. The boundary between high and good class for medium and large streams was set as the 95th or 5th percentiles.