Black box vs gray box: Comparing GAP and GPrep-DFTB for ruthenium and ruthenium oxide.

Abstract

The increasing popularity of machine learning (ML) approaches in computational modeling, most prominently ML interatomic potentials, opened possibilities that were unthinkable only a few years ago-structure and dynamics for systems up to many thousands of atoms at an abinitio level of accuracy. Strictly referring to ML interatomic potentials, however, a number of modeling applications are out of reach, specifically those that require explicit electronic structure. Hybrid ("gray box") models based on, e.g., approximate, semi-empirical abinitio electronic structure with the aid of some ML components offer a convenient synthesis that allows us to treat all aspects of a certain physical system on the same footing without targeting a separate ML model for each property. Here, we compare one of these [Density Functional Tight Binding with a Gaussian Process Regression repulsive potential (GPrep-DFTB)] with its fully "black box" counterpart, the Gaussian approximation potential, by evaluating performance in terms of accuracy, extrapolation power, and data efficiency for the metallic Ru and oxide RuO2 systems, given exactly the same training set. The accuracy with respect to the training set or similar chemical motifs turns out to be comparable. GPrep-DFTB is, however, slightly more data efficient. The robustness of GPRep-DFTB in terms of extrapolation power is much less clear-cut for the binary system than for the pristine system, most likely due to imperfections in the electronic parametrization.