Abstract
International Relations researchers study the interactions of states in the international system. Excluded from almost all such analyses is any consideration of how those states became members of the international system. State Making researchers, in contrast, focus on the formation experiences of states. Drawing on insights from both approaches, we argue that states with positive birth legacies should be more successful at state-making and achieve more favorable outcomes at the international level than states without positive birth legacies. As fighting and winning wars are a common pathway to political development, states with positive birth legacies should be more likely to participate in and win interstate and civil wars. Statistical analyses of all states in the international system from 1816 to 2002 support our expectations.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have