Abstract
We tested the heterogeneity/productivity hypothesis with respect to the abundance and richness of birds and the vegetation density hypothesis with respect to birds' nest predation rates, and determined the relative importance of forested vegetation formations for the conservation of birds in the Pantanal. We estimated the apparent nesting success, and the abundance and richness of nesting birds' in four forest types, by monitoring nests during two reproductive seasons in four forested physiognomies (two high productivity/heterogeneity evergreen forests = Cambará and Landi; two low productivity/heterogeneity dry forests = Cordilheira and Carvoeiro) in the Pantanal wetland in Poconé, State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. We found 381 nests of 46 species (35 Passeriformes and 11 non-Passeriformes) in the four forest types. Of these, we monitored 220 active nests belonging to 44 species, 101 during the reproductive season of 2001 and 119 in 2002. We supported the productivity/heterogeneity hypothesis since the two evergreen forests had higher nest abundance and one of them (Cambará) had higher nesting species richness than the dry forests. The number of nests found in each habitat differed with most nests monitored in the Cambará forest (82%), followed by Landi (9%), Cordilheira (6%) and Carvoeiro (3%) forests. The total number of nests monitored was significantly higher in evergreen forests than in dry forests. Also, more species nested in evergreen (37 species) than in dry (16 species) forests. A Correspondence Analysis revealed that only Carvoeiros had a different nesting bird community. The overall apparent nesting success of 220 nests was 26.8%. We did not support the vegetation density hypothesis since nest predation rates were similar between evergreen (73.5%) and dry (70%) forests, and were higher in the Landi (85%) than in the other three forests (69.2 to 72.2%). Our data indicate that Cambará forests seem to be a key nesting habitat for many bird species of the Pantanal. If this local pattern also occurs in other regions of the Pantanal, the use and management of Cambará forests might prove to be important for the conservation of forest birds of this biome. However, conflicting results with other taxonomic groups show that conservation measures for these forests and land use policies should be based on a more complete biodiversity evaluation of the region.
Highlights
Locations with a large availability of energy are more qualified to support a greater number of individuals and species (Connell and Orias, 1964)
For the nesting success analyses we only considered active nests, discarding nests that were abandoned during the construction phase (Table 1)
Considering the four forest types, the nest encounter success was greatest in Cambará (0.77 nests/hour) compared to the other three forests (Landi = 0.08 nests/hour; Cordilheira = 0.06 nests/ hour; Carvoeiro = 0.03 nests/hour)
Summary
Locations with a large availability of energy are more qualified to support a greater number of individuals and species (Connell and Orias, 1964). More complex Amazonian forest had more birds than less structured forest from the same biome (Borges, 2004). More complex vegetation types decrease the effects of seasonality, resulting in higher stability in resource availability hosting more year-long residents (Hurlbert and Haskell, 2003; Manhães and Dias, 2011). Some habitats have better food resources, while others offer better protection against extreme climatic variations or offer safer locations for nest construction to decrease predation risk (Wittenberger, 1980). This way, habitat availability and its quality directly act on survival and reproductive success (Martin, 1995). Natural selection should favor individuals that choose habitats and nesting sites that are adequate (ex. high food availability, low abundance of predators) and have life history characteristics that reduce the negative effects of nest predation (Nalwanga et al, 2004; Kristan III, 2007)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.