Abstract
Background: Modular external fixations used in the Philippines are manufactured abroad, leading to high costs and limited availability, making them unaffordable for most Filipino patients. The reliability of some external fixators is limited because not all have undergone biomechanical testing. Objective: This study aims to determine the biomechanical stability of locally manufactured modular external fixator clamps (iFIX) versus commercially available fixators (Roger-Anderson) for tibial shaft fractures. Methodology: The biomechanical stability (stiffness, yield, ultimate strength) under loading of the local prototypes compared with the commercially available fixators. Result: No slippage was observed in all rods, pins, and clamps in all groups. No bending occurred in any rods or pins in all groups. There was also no apparent deformation of the internal threading of the pins within the tibial analogs. The commercial fixator group’s ultimate load to failure up was double (110.57% difference) that of the local prototype. Conclusion: The differences in the biomechanical performance between the iFIX and Roger-Anderson clamps may be attributed to variations in clamp material composition. The iFIX fixator exhibited lower stiffness but did not display deformation under axial loading, component displaced slippage, or thread loosening, making it comparable to the commercial fixator.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
