Abstract
Abstract Background Several authors implemented different biomarkers to evaluate and quantify the size of effective atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation lesions after pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) with thermal energy source. However, limited data have been reported on the effects of a new form of non-thermal energy such as electroporation obtained by means of a pulsed-field ablation (PFA, Farapulse) system. Purpose Our analysis aims to compare acute myocardial injury through different biomarkers variation after PVI performed with different technologies (PFA vs radiofrequency, RF). Methods All consecutive patients (pts) undergoing AF ablation with PFA at our center were included. A PFA protocol-directed PVI was applied using 2kV with 8 applications per vein. RF deliveries were deployed according to a wide antral lesion set around the PVs at 50W. Pre- and post-procedure samples of cardiac troponin I (hs-TnI, ng/l), creatinine kinase-MB (CK-MB, ng/dl), fibrinogen (FB, mg/dl), myoglobin (Myo, ng/ml), N-terminal (NT)-pro hormone B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP, pg/ml) and C-reactive protein (CRP, mg/dl) values were collected before PVI and at 24h after ablation. Ablation endpoint was PVI. Results Fourty-nine pts were included (62±12 years, 63% male, 84% with paroxysmal AF). PFA cases were 35 (71.4%) whereas RF cases were 14 (28.6%). Evaluating the kinetic of each cardiac biomarker, no differences were found between baseline and 24h for both FB (363±93 at baseline vs 387±112 at 24h, p=0.4513) and NT-ProBNP (137[61-462] at baseline vs 227[157-423] at 24h, p=0.0544). On the contrary kinetics of remaining biomarkers differed and significantly increased from baseline to 24h: 61±22 to 112±101 for Myo level, p=0.0017; 0.38±0.2 to 1.45±2.2 for CRP values, p<0.0001; 1.5±0.7 to 19.4±14 for CK-MB level, p<0.0001 and 11.2±20 to 6177±5765 for hs-TnI level, p<0.0001. By looking at the effect of the ablation strategy on cardiac biomarkers, hs-TnI level, CRP level and CK-MB were significantly different between groups at 24h after PFA/RF (hs-TnI: 7556±6025 for PFA vs 2038±1257 for RF, p<0.0001; CRP: 1.6±2.3 for PFA vs 0.9±1.2 for RF, p=0.0297; CK-MB: 23.7±12 for PFA vs 6.3±9.6 for RF, p<0.0001). PVI was achieved in all patients (100%) using only RF or PFA. No major procedure-related adverse events were reported. Conclusion Our preliminary results showed that cardiac troponin I enzyme level, C-reactive protein and creatinine kinase-MB increased after PVI by means of both radiofrequency and pulsed-field ablation and were higher after cellular electroporation by PFA than RF.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.