Biomarker for infection in children with decompensated chronic liver disease: Neutrophilic CD64 or procalcitonin?

Abstract

ObjectiveBiomarkers with high accuracy for identification of infection in decompensated chronic liver disease (DCLD) are urgently needed. We compared the accuracy of neutrophilic cluster of differentiation 64 (nCD64) with procalcitonin for diagnosis of bacterial infection in children with DCLD. MethodsConsecutive children admitted with DCLD were enrolled prospectively. nCD64 was assessed by flow cytometry and expressed in percentage. nCD64, procalcitonin and hemogram were measured at admission and 7-14 days after treatment in those with infection. Complete work-up for infection was done. Presence, site and severity of infection was classified as per guidelines. Results107 children [64 boys, age 97(18-168) months] were enrolled. 78(72.9%) had infection, 26(24%) had severe sepsis and 60(56%) had systemic inflammatory response syndrome. The commonest site of infection was ascitic fluid (n=37), followed by pneumonia (n=24), urinary tract (n=15), bacteraemia (n=10), cholangitis (n=8) and cellulitis (n=3). nCD64 (cut-off-51%, AUC-0.82) had a higher sensitivity (79.5%) and specificity (82.8%) than procalcitonin (cut-off ≥0.58ng/mL, AUC-0.74, sensitivity-76.9% and specificity-62.1%) for diagnosis of infection. nCD64 and procalcitonin correlated with infection severity, being highest in children with severe sepsis [88(71-97) %and 1.98(0.83-10.36) ng/mL], than in infection alone [72(45-84) % and 1.09(0.45-2.07) ng/mL], and no-infection [36(20.2-48) % and 0.42(0.19-1.08) ng/mL]. There was no difference in diagnostic utility of procalcitonin or nCD64 with different sites of infection. Elevation of all 3 parameters (nCD64, PCT and total leukocyte count) was uncommon but highly specific for presence of infection. ConclusionnCD64 identifies infection better than procalcitonin and correlates well with infection severity in children with DCLD.